FiberLink app iconFiberLink
Get the app
Field notes

Splitter ratios and dBm: what 1:32 really costs you

In a passive optical network the splitter is where most of your light goes. Not the kilometres, not the splices — the splitter. Understanding that one line item is most of what separates a plan that closes from a plan that gets rebuilt.

The physics, briefly

A splitter divides power, it does not amplify it. Split light into two equal paths and each path gets half — 3 dB down — plus a fraction of a decibel lost in the device itself. Every doubling costs another 3 dB and change.

RatioTheoreticalPlan for
1:23.0 dB3.5 dB
1:46.0 dB7.0 dB
1:89.0 dB10.5 dB
1:1612.0 dB14.0 dB
1:3215.0 dB17.5 dB
1:6418.0 dB21.0 dB

Read that bottom row again: a single 1:64 splitter spends more of your budget than 50 km of fiber. Distance is cheap. Splitting is expensive.

Unbalanced taps

Splitters do not have to be even. A 30/70 tap sends 70% of the power down the long run and 30% into a nearby cluster — useful along a linear route where one branch has far more distance ahead of it than the other. Plan roughly 5.5 dB on the 30% leg and 1.8 dB on the 70% leg, plus device loss.

Unbalanced taps are the tool of choice for ribbon-development FTTH: villages strung along a road, apartment risers, industrial parks on a single feeder.

Do this on your phone instead.
FiberLink runs the whole subtraction for you as you build the tree — every node shows its own line-by-line math, and the finished plan exports as a PDF. Get it free on Google Play →

One stage or two?

Serving 32 homes can be one 1:32 at the cabinet, or a 1:4 at the cabinet feeding eight 1:8s in the street. Same subscriber count, different consequences:

The extra decibel almost always buys itself back in trench metres. Just don't let the cascade run away — three stages is usually a sign the architecture wants revisiting.

Rules of thumb worth keeping

Keep reading